Re: Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: Worse, the QPL is not DFSG-free
Thanks for not CCing me as i have repeatedly asked here.
>On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 10:07:57PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>> Furthermore, as the choice of law is the french law, preliminary information
>> seem to indicate that any procedure should be domiciliated at the domicil of
>> the defendor, which would make this clause illegal and thus void.
>Good, then upstream should not object to this void clause being removed
>from the license.
Sure whatever. i have done my homework, asked for advice, which altough legal
was not exactly of this field, and this is really non conclusive.
And i will _NOT_ go to upstream about this issue without solid evidence that
this is really a problem, evidence that i have not seen upto now.