[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: DRAFT: debian-legal summary of the QPL



On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 11:38:23AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> You have, and those arguments are weak. There's also disagreement here -
> some people claim forced distribution breaches DFSG 1, some claim it
> breaches DFSG 5. There's no consistent and coherent argument going on,
> other than a sort of fuzzy "We think it's not free, and we can sort of
> point at these two things and handwave and say they cover them". And,
> frankly, that's not convincing. 

> The GPL discriminates against a slightly smaller set of dissidents. 

Which set?

> The GPL discriminates against people on desert islands who have a 
> binary CD but not a source one.

How?

> Make the tests sufficiently silly and we can ban every single license
> for discriminating against a field of endeavour.

Sure, but I don't think either the dissident test or the desert island
test fall into this category.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: