[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: DRAFT: debian-legal summary of the QPL

>>>>> "Steve" == Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> writes:

    >> I don't necessarily object to the point that the dissident test
    >> is trying to make (not that I necessarily agree with it), but I
    >> do object to its phrasing. It's obviously more concerned with
    >> banning forced distribution of source than it is with the
    >> safety of dissidents. It should just be replaced with "Forced
    >> distribution of source to anyone other than the recipient is
    >> non-free", and then we can have a nice big argument about
    >> whether that should be in the DFSG or not.

    Steve> Sounds good.

I also think that this would be good to try and add to the DFSG.  I
think it would make a position we've tacidly had here on -legal much
more clear than it is now.


Reply to: