Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: Worse, the QPL is not DFSG-free
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 04:27:41PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > And also a proposal on how to make the licence non-free, instead of
> > the "please switch to the GPL" which is sure to be received with
> > laugthers or even some anger when i go upstream with it.
>
> I am changing this in the second draft. The primary recommendation will
> still be to dual-license with the GPL. A second, discouraged
> recommendation will be to waive the two problematic clauses of the QPL.
You haven't responded to my objections to you reasoning though.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: