Re: DRAFT: debian-legal summary of the QPL
Brian Thomas Sniffen <bts@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>The test itself, though, remains clear: Any requirement for sending
>source modifications to anyone other than the recipient of the
>modified binary---in fact any forced distribution at all, beyond
>giving source to those who receive a copy of the binary -- is non
>free.
Why does it not say this, rather than rambling about dissidents?
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59-chiark.mail.debian.legal@srcf.ucam.org
Reply to: