[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: Worse, the QPL is not DFSG-free



MJ Ray wrote:

> In general, I don't think this ocaml bug should be pursued until
> general issues have been settled (or comprehensively fail to reach
> anything like consensus in reasonable time) for libcwd, which came
> here more recently. Is it proper for any packager of a QPL'd work
> currently in main to tag this moreinfo,help and wait a while?
Seems reasonable to me.  :-)

-- 
There are none so blind as those who will not see.



Reply to: