[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Choice of venue, was: GUADEC report

MJ Ray wrote:
> On 2004-07-12 18:40:36 +0100 Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> wrote:
> >I don't think you're making a viable argument.
> I was trying to summarise the argument as described to me. I think 
> it's rude of you to ignore that and shoot the messenger. I said in the 
> DWN-submitted 
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/06/msg00514.html that I'm 
> not sure about these terms myself.
> I don't think that was a beneficial contribution.

From the perspective of someone coming in late and reading the thread,
you are a proponent of choice of venue clauses not being DFSG free. If
you're not, you might want to make that clear. If you're trying to be a
disinterested observer or summariser, you should really do a better job
of presenting both sides of the argument.

see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: