Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: Worse, the QPL is not DFSG-free
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 09:29:01AM -0400, Brian T. Sniffen wrote:
> On Jul 9, 2004, at 11:14 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
> >On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 05:54:05AM -0400, Brian T. Sniffen wrote:
> >>Package: ocaml
> >>Version: 3.07.2a-2
> >>Followup-For: Bug #227159
> >>The compilers are also distributed under the QPL, which is
> >And ? What is the problem ? Even RMS and the FSF is not claiming that
> >the QPL is non-free, just that it is incompatible with the GPL, but
> >since it is not linked with GPLed code, this is no problem.
> The problem comes from these three clauses:
Oh come on, don't be ridicoulous, if the QPL suddenly becomes
DFSG-non-free, then fine, but i would like to have an official statement
from debian-legal about this.
Until then, please discuss this but i will not act in any way.