[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: Worse, the QPL is not DFSG-free

* Brian T. Sniffen:

> That is, I owe two fees to the initial developer of the software.
> First, I give him a license to distribute my modifications in future
> versions of the software, and to use that code in non-free derivatives
> of the software.  Second, if he asks for it I also supply a copy even
> if I have not distributed them to anyone.  This is a fee as described
> by DFSG #1.

This argument *must* be flawed because the same argument can show that
*any* copyleft license violates DFSG #1, which clearly is not the case.

Reply to: