On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 04:00:36AM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote: > I'm also not in favor of this tacit "assume we aren't violating the > intent of the license when we're clearly violating the letter of it, > unless we find out otherwise" precedent that's being set by this; we > didn't accept it for KDE, so why is it okay for the kernel? Because some folks have to have someone else to blame for their own ignorance. -- G. Branden Robinson | Half of being smart is knowing what Debian GNU/Linux | you're dumb at. branden@debian.org | -- David Gerrold http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature