On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 10:53:14PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 04:32:01 -0500 Ryan Rasmussen wrote:> > 13.7 Entire Agreement; Governing Law. This License constitutes the > > entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject > > matter hereof. This License shall be governed by the laws of the > > United States and the State of California, except that body of > > California law concerning conflicts of law. > > Choice of law clause. This is regarded as fine, IIRC. Under the proviso that the law chosen is not in itself an issue. > > Where You are located in the province of Quebec, Canada, the following > > clause applies: The parties hereby confirm that they have requested > > that this License and all related documents be drafted in English. Les > > parties ont exige que le present contrat et tous les documents > > connexes soient rediges en anglais. > > This seems a discrimination betwwen people and thus to violate DFSG#5 > (No Discrimination Against Persons or Groups). Nah, this is just a reference to a particularly stupid tenet of their law. I once saw some film or other that satirised it rather well: A group of people were driving along a road in Canada, in a lorry with "FUCK CANADA!" spray-painted on the side. They were stopped by the police and told to add a French translation. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature