Re: Visualboy Advance question.
Walter Landry <email@example.com> writes:
> Evan Prodromou <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 19:02, Josh Triplett wrote:
>> > While I agree that it is not necessarily required that a Free package
>> > Depend on some piece of Free data for it to operate on, I do believe
>> > that if there is _no_ Free data for the package to run with, and that
>> > data is required in order to operate, then the package must go in
>> > contrib until at least one free piece of data is available.
>> I just don't think that software Depends: on the data it manipulates the
>> way that it Depends: on, say, libraries or other programs.
>> It also seems terribly unhackerly. I mean, heck: if I'd like to create
>> some Free Gameboy ROMs, I'd want to do it on a Free operating system.
>> Lastly, I guess there's just something really violating about thinking
>> that Debian is judging the data I have, or could have, on my hard drive.
>> So I'm not working with Free data. So what? Mind your own beeswax,
> This was all discussed to death when Quake 2 was GPL'd . The main
> problem I see is that if you accept these arguments, contrib becomes
> empty. Whether you like it or not, there is a value judgement going
> on with contrib vs. main. If something is not "useful" enough with
> non-free bits, then it goes into contrib.
Huh? Contrib would still have Java applications that require the
non-free jre, stuff that build-depends on non-free software, those
installer packages, etc...
You win again, gravity!