Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
> > Michael Poole <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> >># Unless otherwise specified, all modifications, corrections or
> >># extensions to this work which alter its source code become the
> >># property of Best Practical Solutions, LLC when submitted for
> >># inclusion in the work.
> > This is a GPL-incompatible restriction. It is also non-free. Best
> > Practical Solutions has not transfered its copyrights to *me*.
> > They've given me a license under the GPL. That's all they can assume
> > when I send them a patch for inclusion.
> Is it still non-free even though you are not required to submit patches
> to them for inclusion?
The problem here is that this clause could plausibly take effect if a
third party submits the patch to Best Practical Solutions, LLC.
Licenses that require the assignment of copyrights to the author of a
work are clearly not free. I'm fairly comfortable with considering
clauses that do assignment without the expressed approval of the
author of the patch non-free as well.
EQUAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN
Don't be teased or humiliated. See their look of surprise when you
step right up to a urinal and use it with a smile. Get Dr. Mary Evers'
EQUAL-NOW Adapter (pat. appld. for) -- purse size, fool proof,
sanitary -- comes in nine lovely, feminine, psychadelic patterns --
requires no fitting, no prescriptions.
-- Robert A Heinlein _I Will Fear No Evil_ p470.