On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 02:35:55PM -0400, Evan Prodromou wrote: > AS> We've done these to death already, starting in 2003. They're > AS> non-free. That won't change. > > Ah. Well, could you respond to my points as to why I think they _are_ > free? I disagree with the terms of the summary. You acknowledged at least two reasons why it was non-free. I didn't write the summary. The discussions which resulted in the summary are the significant part, and I dimly recall they had valid points, but did not follow them closely. Beyond that I'm not personally inclined to analyse a license which is clearly non-free for other reasons; it's time-consuming. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature