[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element

On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 02:35:55PM -0400, Evan Prodromou wrote:
>     AS> We've done these to death already, starting in 2003. They're
>     AS> non-free. That won't change.
> Ah. Well, could you respond to my points as to why I think they _are_
> free? I disagree with the terms of the summary.

You acknowledged at least two reasons why it was non-free. I didn't
write the summary. The discussions which resulted in the summary are
the significant part, and I dimly recall they had valid points, but
did not follow them closely. Beyond that I'm not personally inclined
to analyse a license which is clearly non-free for other reasons; it's

  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: