Re: libkrb53 - odd license term
On 2004-06-07 12:53:37 +0100 Walter Landry <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
He is not the only person who thinks the license is ambiguous.
Sure, but the stated reasons about assuming copyright seem to be
either misreading the licence or misunderstanding copyright.
he the only person who thinks that you're being a bit touchy. Take a
Some seem to have the idea I'm touchy/snapping/angry. Those people
don't know me and must be adding some non-existant intonantion to my
emails. Rest assured, I am quite tranquil and it usually takes more
than emails to annoy me.
My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ for creative copyleft computing
Help hack the EuroParl! http://mjr.towers.org.uk/proj/eurovote/