On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 07:45:40PM -0400, Walter Landry wrote: > Gah. I really have to read more carefully. I read the license again, > and it says that you have to sue a Contributor or sue about a patent > related to the Program. So if SCO had distributed stuff under the IBM > CPL, They may very well have done so -- SCO is not known for innovation. > then IBM would have lost all patent rights. It still sounds like > a license bug, but not quite so serious. If we can establish a plausible case here, it does make the issue of the IBMPL/CPL ripe for reconsideration by IBM. It would be nice if they'd work with the community in developing the successor to the IBMPL/CPL. -- G. Branden Robinson | If we believe absurdities, we Debian GNU/Linux | shall commit atrocities. branden@debian.org | -- Voltaire http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature