Re: The draft Position statement on the GFDL
> > If there is no distribution or publishing going on -- if you are writing
> > the additional code which is being incorporated into the program --
> > there is no problem. You have full rights to everything you write and
> > you're giving everyone who has a copy (yourself) all the rights the GPL
> > demands (for example, you have the right to give all others GPLed rights
> > to this work).
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 03:48:59PM -0400, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
> This conflicts with what you've been saying for the past week or so --
> you've been asserting that I can't combine gcc and metafont, or Emacs
> and OpenSSL, without violating the GPL.
> Now you're changing your story.
I thought I changed my story a while ago (when I looked up metafont and
found it was available under the terms of the GPL)?
Let's go for emacs and openssl. If there is no distribution of
emacs+openssl, then there is no problem. Are you asserting that this
is the case?