[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The draft Position statement on the GFDL

Raul Miller wrote:

>> > So, in essence, you think that the DFSG says we must disallow the
>> > distribution of gcc if its license prevents you distributing copies
>> > which have been functionally modified to better integrate with
>> > microsoft's palladium?
> On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 09:13:13AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
>> Yes.  From DFSG 6:
>> > The license must not restrict anyone from making use of the program
>> > in a specific field of endeavor. For example, it may not restrict the
>> > program from being used in a business, or from being used for genetic
>> > research.
>> ... or for being used to promote Treacherous Computing.
> And what about DSFG 10?
> Because that's exactly the license gcc is distributed under.

No, it doesn't.  Perhaps you don't understand the GPL?  Or perhaps you don't
understand copyright, licensing, and the meaning of "derivative work"?

Or are you trying to make a point which you haven't managed to clearly make

There are none so blind as those who will not see.

Reply to: