Re: The draft Position statement on the GFDL
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 10:07:10AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
>> On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 09:18:00AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> > Oh. Well, the GFDL with Invariant Sections requires bloat in
>> > distributed binaries.
>> Where the GFDL is used to license programs, it's not something that we
>> can distribute under the DFSG. [As this could require us to not fix
>> security problems.]
> The GFDL could requires us not to fix factual inaccuracies.
There are none so blind as those who will not see.