Re: IBM Public License (again)
On 2004-05-14 10:58:00 +0100 Raul Miller <email@example.com> wrote:
However, you can't base that claim on the assertion that the license
is non-free. "Contaminating other software" would make the license
non-free, but the converse is not necessarily true.
Does this post stating truisms mean anything besides a lower
Signal:Noise ratio? I am not sure whether it contains any new
information, nor whether you expect a reply.
My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ for creative copyleft computing