[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: IBM Public License (again)

On 2004-05-14 10:58:00 +0100 Raul Miller <moth@debian.org> wrote:

However, you can't base that claim on the assertion that the license
is non-free.  "Contaminating other software" would make the license
non-free, but the converse is not necessarily true.

Does this post stating truisms mean anything besides a lower Signal:Noise ratio? I am not sure whether it contains any new information, nor whether you expect a reply.

My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ for creative copyleft computing

Reply to: