Re: IBM Public License (again)
On 2004-05-14 03:28:02 +0100 Steve Langasek <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
So you prefer that the license, like most earlier Free Software
licenses, say nothing at all about patents in order to remain free,
while IBM retains the freedom to sue you for infringing their patents
*whether or not* you sued them first?
I prefer a royalty-free non-contaminating patent licence for all
patents covering this software, of course.
My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ for creative copyleft computing