Hi, I'm a long-time Debian user, and also one of the upstream developers for gramps package. Among other things, I am the author of most of the documentation and the docs' copyright holder. Since our package is a gnome application, we simply used a standard boilerplate which most of the gnome apps used to use (distributed with the scrollkeeper example: GFDL license with no invariant sections, no front/back cover matters, etc). Now that I read the Draft Debian Position Statement put together on the page of Manoj Srivastava, I think we'd like to change the way our docs are licensed. What would the debain-legal people suggest we use for the documentation license instead of GFDL? Thanks in advance, Alex -- Alexander Roitman http://ebner.neuroscience.umn.edu/people/alex.html Dept. of Neuroscience, Lions Research Building 2001 6th Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 Tel (612) 625-7566 FAX (612) 626-9201
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part