On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 04:32:46PM +0530, Mahesh T. Pai wrote: > Several people in Debian (and outside it too) have other problems with > the GFDL. Such opinion typically is that the GFDL obstructs further > copying of the copies you *make*. These people think the GFDL is > written in English, which is a mistake. > > If you read the GFDL in legalese, (and that is what a court will do, > if a dispute arises), you will realise that the GFDL does not oblige > me to allow people access to a copy of a GFDL'd document I made for my > use. Therefore, I am justified in things like using an encrypted > filesystem to store GFDL'd document. Are you a lawyer, and does this constitute legal advice, such that if you are proven wrong in a court of law, we can pass liability on to you? If not, you can take that assertion and stick it. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature