[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The draft Position statement on the GFDL

> > So, backing up a bit: can you suggest a license clause which would be
> > allowed under the "some modifications" interpretation of DFSG#3 and
> > disallowed under "all modifications", while still passing DFSG#4, and
> > not falling under "rules lawyering" like the above?  That is, an example
> > showing that the different interpretation is meaningful.  (I think the
> > lack of one is why this is somewhat difficult to discuss.)

On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 01:57:14AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> Sure -- imagine that there exists a clause in the terms of some copyright
> which prohibited the distribution of some class of modification to some
> part of the work which very clearly wasn't the source code to a program.

For example: where the GPL specifies that the GPL cannot be modified.


Reply to: