Re: POSSIVEL SPAM-- Re: Binary-only firmware covered by the GPL?
> In fact, I was going to suggest that quite possibly, there really *is* no
> other option for source, because the target hardware doesn't have a
> functional enough toolchain...
One uses a cross-compiler or cross-assembler.
> ...so hand-assembly really *is* the most reasonable thing.
If the file was created by hand-assembly then assembler is the preferred
form for modification.
John Hasler You may treat this work as if it
firstname.lastname@example.org were in the public domain.
Dancing Horse Hill I waive all rights.