Re: Cryptlib licence
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 06:17:12PM -0800, Ben Reser wrote:
> If the cryptlib author would state that he agrees with sleepycat's
> clarifications then I don't think there are any problems with this
Upon further review looks like the author has done this basically on
"A good overview and background behind the Sleepycat license, which also
applies for cryptlib, is also available."
Which links to:
Which contains similar clarifications of the meaning of the Sleepycat
license. So I think it's clear that the author intends to take the same
interpretation of the license as Sleepycat does.
Ben Reser <email@example.com>
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken