[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Cryptlib licence

On Mar 4, 2004, at 17:53, Matthew Palmer wrote:

Copyright 1992-2004 Peter Gutmann. All rights reserved.

This "All rights reserved" followed by a "go nuts" licence always seems to jar with me. Does anyone else have the same cognitive dissonance whenever
they read one of these?

No, just ignore it, it's legal boilerplate. I think it may actually be needed in all of one country...

Reply to: