[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?

Scripsit bts@alum.mit.edu (Brian T. Sniffen)

> It concerned E-Lisp APIs.  If you call cons or even unwind-protect,
> that's clearly not copyrightable.  But if you call
> gnus-agent-cat-downloadable-faces, that's an internal function
> call

An internal function call is not an API, and it is reasonable to
expect the law (as applied by courts with a clue, assuming that such
courts exist, yada yada) to treat them differently.

> -- anything that was a Method of Operation would be (interactive).

Is cons or unwind-protect (interactive)?

Henning Makholm                                 "Need facts -- *first*. Then
                                            the dialysis -- the *analysis*."

Reply to: