Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Scripsit email@example.com (Brian T. Sniffen)
> It concerned E-Lisp APIs. If you call cons or even unwind-protect,
> that's clearly not copyrightable. But if you call
> gnus-agent-cat-downloadable-faces, that's an internal function
An internal function call is not an API, and it is reasonable to
expect the law (as applied by courts with a clue, assuming that such
courts exist, yada yada) to treat them differently.
> -- anything that was a Method of Operation would be (interactive).
Is cons or unwind-protect (interactive)?
Henning Makholm "Need facts -- *first*. Then
the dialysis -- the *analysis*."