Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Sven Luther <email@example.com> writes:
> Yeah, but as i see it, there is no need for such a licence change, and
> the upstream author being an intelligent person, will probably
> immediately see it, and respond to me : but there is no need for such
> a change. And then, were do i stand ? I was expecting help from
> debian-legal to know what to respond to him, but look at what i get.
I understand that you asked for help providing a reason for a license
change. But d-l isn't the best place to go for that help in this case;
the FSF is. They have people who answer questions about GPL
compatibility, and I'm sure they can explain their reasoning much more
authoritatively than we can. They're the experts on GPL compatibility,
not us. If you send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org and politely explain the
situation I'm sure they'd be willing to help you.
Jeremy Hankins <email@example.com>
PGP fingerprint: 748F 4D16 538E 75D6 8333 9E10 D212 B5ED 37D0 0A03