In article <[🔎] slrnbihnhr.3jh.markj+0111@bouncing.localnet>, MJ Ray wrote: > ... Both FSF and Debian agree that FDL-covered works are not free > software, ... To the best of my knowledge, this is not correct: RMS seems to argue that a manual published under the FDL is free in the free software sense, since you can make any functional changes you want. (I disagree with RMS, and I don't know it matters so much.) Peace, Dylan