Re: GFDL - status?
Branden said:
>On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 02:17:55PM -0000, MJ Ray wrote:
>> Mark Rafn <dagon@dagon.net> wrote:
>> > This reminded me to ask: I haven't seen anything recently on the
>topic of
>> > what to do about GFDLed Debian packages. What's the current state
>of
>> > this discussion?
>>
>> I think Branden published a proposed summary, which provoked some
>> discussion.
>
>Er, I think actually that Anthony Towns is the person who did that.
>
>> I believe we are waiting for a revised draft of that, or further
>> explanation from FSF. To me, discussing it further before one or the
>> other of the above appears seems to be redundant.
>
>We should probably go ahead with another draft of that document, yes.
Right, so is anyone doing that?
--
Nathanael Nerode <neroden at gcc.gnu.org>
Why not to use the GNU FDL:
http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html
Reply to: