On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 02:10:17PM -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote: > On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 22:27, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > Debian doesn't *have* a definition. > > Well, we call it a guideline but I'm not sure I see a difference. Ean, I expostulated one perspective in the following message: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200303/msg00211.html So far it hasn't met with any objections. -- G. Branden Robinson | Religion is regarded by the common Debian GNU/Linux | people as true, by the wise as branden@debian.org | false, and by the rulers as useful. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Lucius Annaeus Seneca
Attachment:
pgpEZ0uLRCXhx.pgp
Description: PGP signature