On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 01:55:22PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > This simple approach appeals to me, not least because it makes the GNU > > GPL more easily applicable to things that aren't software: > > > > source form = preferred form for modification of the Work > > object form = any other form of the Work > > It seems foolish for us to declare this definitively when I don't > think we've thought through all the possible consequences. I do think > that what you say is the right idea; I'm just not confident that we > won't realize someday that there really is some third category. Well, let's get to thinkin', then. I've still got a DFCL to write (;-)) and this issue is important. -- G. Branden Robinson | If God had intended for man to go Debian GNU/Linux | about naked, we would have been branden@debian.org | born that way. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgplCXixJoyv3.pgp
Description: PGP signature