On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Andrew Suffield wrote: > No you aren't. I've never met an academic who did this unless it was > actually relevant to the talk. Normally you just put a footnote in > the associated paper. Often you'll see an acknowledgement/thanks page in talks which lists who actually did the work, and a footnote under every figure|table which came from someone elses work. Regarding acknowledgements in papers, yes... one of my major professor's works has an acknowledgement to "Dr. Smirnov for stimulating critical thought processes" [iirc... don't have it in front of me.] Don Armstrong -- If I had a letter, sealed it in a locked vault and hid the vault somewhere in New York. Then told you to read the letter, thats not security, thats obscurity. If I made a letter, sealed it in a vault, gave you the blueprints of the vault, the combinations of 1000 other vaults, access to the best lock smiths in the world, then told you to read the letter, and you still can't, thats security. -- Bruce Schneier http://www.donarmstrong.com http://www.anylevel.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature