On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 08:34:24AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > You missed the one big one, too: the apparent requirement to preferentially > licence modifications you make to the copyright holders of the original SE > copyright holders. Don't worry, I missed it too at first. <grin> Well, it turns out to be irrelevant as the upstream copyright holders seem disinclined to do anything at all about the licensing at present. -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux | De minimis non curat lex. branden@debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature