Re: Request for licence assessment: spellcast
On 2003-10-06 14:00:59 +0100 Matthew Palmer <email@example.com> wrote:
Would anyone care to comment on my interpretation, specifically to
or rebuff my belief that this licence is not suitable for inclusion in
I support your interpretation. As stated, the licence discriminates
against profitable distribution. The clarification suggests that
their intention was to create an anti-commercial licence, not to make
it free software in the normal sense.
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ firstname.lastname@example.org
Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
PM 8+9 Oct: visit me @ AFFS on .ORG stand, at www.linuxexpo.org.uk