[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A possible GFDL compromise

Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:

>     You have mistaken the objection.  There is no reason to think it would
>     be a small fractional increase, especially since little parts of
>     manuals--single paragraphs even--are useful reusable bits just in the
>     way that single functions of Lisp are.
> Reusing a single paragraph is fair use--you don't need to follow the
> license conditions.

This is not true if we are reusing all the paragraphs, by extensive
reworking and reassembly.  (Say, to manufacture doc strings.)


Reply to: