[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GNU FDL and Debian

In article <slrnbihnhr.3jh.markj+0111@bouncing.localnet>, MJ Ray wrote:
> ...  Both FSF and Debian agree that FDL-covered works are not free
> software, ...

To the best of my knowledge, this is not correct: RMS seems to argue
that a manual published under the FDL is free in the free software
sense, since you can make any functional changes you want.

(I disagree with RMS, and I don't know it matters so much.)


Reply to: