Re: GNU FDL and Debian
Scripsit Barak Pearlmutter <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > ... To the extent that the GFDL caters for the wishes of publishers
> > at all, it is in that it makes it inconvenient for *competing*
> > publishers to publish and sell hardcopies. ...
> I'm not quite tracking you there. The GFDL isn't supposed to have
> that effect, at least as I read it, and as I understood RMS's
It's the only reason I can see why a publisher would prefer GFDL to
plain GPL. Do you see something that I'm missing?
> Maybe it does though, but even if so that's not really the
> point. The FSF wouldn't consider such an effect desirable,
Sure? In many cases the FSF itself is the publisher, hence the
mandatory Cover Texts on GNU manuals saying that you're a bad person
if you buy a hardcopy not published by the FSF.
Henning Makholm "Han råber og skriger, vakler ud på kørebanen og
ind på fortorvet igen, hæver knytnæven mod en bil,
hilser overmådigt venligt på en mor med barn, bryder ud
i sang og stiller sig til sidst op og pisser i en port."