On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 06:15:35AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: > On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 03:01:17AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > [snip] > > > > s/encryption software packages/& that are not exempted from the export > > control procedure that is used for packages in Main/ > > I find this last change confusing. If they are "not exempted" > from the export control procedure, it should apply to them. How > about > > They cannot be exported from the U.S. because they are encryption > software packages that are not covered by the export control > procedure that is used for packages in Main... > > instead? I agree. When I started writing it I was thinking about the applicability of the U.S. export control regulations themselves, but that's not really what we care about directly. I do suggest s/covered/handled/, thought. > Thanks for reviewing this. No problem! -- G. Branden Robinson | Optimists believe we live in the Debian GNU/Linux | best of all possible worlds. firstname.lastname@example.org | Pessimists are afraid the optimists http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | are right about that.
Description: PGP signature