[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GDB manual

On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 04:37:49PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le ven 23/05/2003 à 14:04, Richard Stallman a écrit :
> > I investigated the situation with the GDB manual.  It has two
> > invariant sections, entitled Free Software and Free Software Needs
> > Free Documentation.  Both sections are secondary.
> That doesn't make the issue go away. An invariant section is invariant,
> and it is not free (even according to your own definition), whether it
> is secondary or not.

More interesting to me is that the GDB Manual didn't used to have any
invariant sections at all, regardless how one classifies them ("primary"
vs. "secondary").

Why were they added?  Is the FSF's intention to add invariant sections
to all of its manuals, even those that didn't have them before?

G. Branden Robinson                |          You live and learn.
Debian GNU/Linux                   |          Or you don't live long.
branden@debian.org                 |          -- Robert Heinlein
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |

Attachment: pgp64Y9sWw8cJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: