Re: The debate on Invariant sections (long)
On 17 May 2003, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > I'd like to believe the former. I think, deep down, that it's probably
> > the first on a conscious level, but it's the latter driving deep in the
> > psyche. Can't totall fault that - one tends to get rather protective of
> > one's life's work...
>
> Neither.
>
> The Emacs manual contained non-free invariant sections long before
> Linux was a twinkle in anyone's eye.
That makes me even more worried. It means that RMS must truly believe that
restricting useful freedoms is a good thing.
Oh how the mighty have fallen...
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
#include <disclaimer.h>
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
Reply to: