[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: LPPL and non-discrimination

On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 02:03:34AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> It probably leaves a bad taste in the mouth of everyone on this list,
> but yes. You're coming closest to violating DFSG 3, if, for example, the
> license required me to actively notify ABC Software, Inc. of the
> changes.

Some of Branden's arguments in


may be relevant to the "license" Jonathan asked about, but probably not
with respect to DFSG5/6, so it may not be relevant to his real question.
That is, the text he gave may pass DFSG5/6, but be non-free for other
reasons.  I don't know if there was any consensus reached from the above

Glenn Maynard

Reply to: