On Wed, 2003-05-07 at 07:21, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 05:59:31PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > You might like to consider some of the other documents accompanying > > WHY-FREE, and their relevance to emacs or Debian. > It looks like RMS used to use the official GNU Emacs distribution in a > similar manner to the one in which he uses his personal webpage today. > > http://www.stallman.org/ > > I'll note that I find myself in sympathy with much of the material on > that webpage. I just don't think most of it's germane to software > distribution, and I do not think it is -- neighborly -- to attach > unremovable, unmodifiable activist literature to software distributions > and call the product "free as in freedom". I think that's a reasonable comment. The offending literature, should be de-bundled from the package and life goes on as normal for us all. Has anybody asked RMS if he is willing to do this? -- John Holroyd <valisk@softhome.net> Demos Technosis Ltd
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part