Re: [OT] Droit d'auteur vs. free software? (Was: query from Georg Greve of GNU about Debian's opinion of the FDL
- To: Mark Rafn <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Cc: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: [OT] Droit d'auteur vs. free software? (Was: query from Georg Greve of GNU about Debian's opinion of the FDL
- From: Nathanael Nerode <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sat, 03 May 2003 15:45:32 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] 3EB41C5C.email@example.com>
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.firstname.lastname@example.org>
- References: <E199zGx-0000wt-00@doctormoo> <20030428103436.GB24405@nic.fr> <20030430084324.GA10906@nic.fr> <Pine.LNX.email@example.com>
Mark Rafn wrote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2003, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
But it is not a real problem. Under the "droit d'auteur", the author's
right over *software* is quite limited
Is this the basic point by which "moral rights" do not prevent software
from being free? They're not generally applied to software?
That would make sense. :-) Thanks to Stephane for informing me of this
If recognition of moral rights is a requirement for a free documentation
license, I propose the GPL be used with the notation that "none of these
terms is intended to infringe those rights over which an author cannot
Is this sufficient to cover droit d'auteur jurisdictions without
limiting the right to modify in common-law areas?
This seems wise...
Changing the subject again, it might be nice if Debian put up a FAQ on
"free licencing issues for non-software", just to catch all of this
stuff in one place...