On Thu, 01 May 2003, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Sat, 26 Apr 2003, Henning Makholm wrote: >> But as we've found out now, the part of the GPL that is actually >> invariant is the preamble, which has no legal content... > > Can you provide me a reference upon which you are basing this > statement? I should remind myself to follow up with all of my unread mail before asking questions which are easily answered.[1] Although, note the dissonance between [1] and [2]: In fact, the GPL is copyrighted, and its license permits only verbatim copying of the entire GPL. Wheras [1] in the FAQ says something to the effect of: "If you modify it, we probably wont take legal action against you" Of course, the language of the GPL copyright clause itself is prety clear that it precludes modification. [I guess the FSF just wants it both ways...] Don Armstrong 1: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#TOCModifyGPL 2: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLOmitPreamble -- I never until now realized that the primary job of any emoticon is to say "excuse me, that didn't make any sense." ;-P -- Cory Doctorow http://www.donarmstrong.com http://www.anylevel.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Attachment:
pgp4GQEO1gNi9.pgp
Description: PGP signature