Re: various opinions on Debian vs the GFDL
Scripsit Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@debian.org>
> Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net> wrote
> > ?) The GFDL is not free when applied to documents if any of
> > the "invariant" or "cover" options are exercised.
> Is it a consensus on debian-legal that a GFDL work *without* any
> Invariant or Cover is indeed free and has no problem being distributed
> in "main"?
I believe so. There is some fudging about the precise definition of
opaque and transparent formats, but I'm not aware that anyone thinks
they would be showstoppers in and of themselves.
--
Henning Makholm "So? We're adaptable. We'll *switch missions*!"
Reply to: