[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposed statement wrt GNU FDL

On Sat, 2003-04-26 at 01:41, Glenn Maynard wrote:

> It still contains an invariant section, though it's less severe than the
> GFDL type, as it can be removed.  I don't believe there's consensus that
> invariant sections in general are okay as long as they can be removed,
> though.

It's nothing special created by the copyright license. Its the general
rule that you aren't allowed to misrepresent other's beliefs, which is
what carrying the Preamble to your modified license (especially the
first two paragraphs), without the FSF's permission, would be.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: