[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposed statement wrt GNU FDL

On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 03:00:00PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> The difference between Office and Invariants is (if I understand the licence
> correctly) that Invariant sections can't be large chunks of the manual -
> only so-called "secondary sections".  

So, if I make a Debian system that includes a single non-free program, the
entire system -- including the non-free program -- is DFSG-free, because the
non-free program can be removed?


Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

  ``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations -- 
        you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''

Attachment: pgpkZPRKdC9UJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: