On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 12:22:27PM -0400, Brian T. Sniffen wrote: > However, the legal text of the GPL is reusable (allowing modification > and distribution), as long as you don't include the name GPL, the > Preamble, or the instructions for use. What makes you think this is the case? Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <email@example.com> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations -- you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''
Description: PGP signature